Nintendo's Switch 2 will hit shelves on June 5, 2025, with a starting price of $449.99, analysis suggests. The next-generation portable console features a 7.9-inch LCD display with 1920 x 1080 resolution and supports a 120Hz refresh rate along with VRR and HDR10 capabilities. By comparison, the Steam Deck, which has sold over 4 million units since its February 2022 launch, comes with a 7-inch LCD display at a lower 1280 x 800 resolution and maxes out at 60Hz refresh rate.

Technical specifications reveal substantial differences between these competing handhelds. The Switch 2 employs a custom Nvidia processor with dedicated RT Cores and Tensor Cores, enabling up to 120 frames per second for exclusive titles. Nintendo's system includes 256GB of non-upgradable internal storage. The Steam Deck, conversely, offers multiple storage configurations from 64GB to 512GB, with the additional benefit of user-upgradable SSD options.

Battery performance varies significantly between the devices. The Switch 2 is expected to last between 2 to 6.5 hours on a single charge, while the Steam Deck provides 2 to 8 hours of gameplay time depending on usage intensity and settings.

As portable gaming continues gaining popularity, these two devices represent distinctly different approaches to handheld gaming hardware. The following analysis examines both systems in detail, comparing key components and performance metrics to determine which offers better value for serious portable gamers in 2025.

Switch 2 vs Steam Deck: Core Hardware Specs

Image Source: Reddit

The Nintendo Switch 2 and Steam Deck represent fundamentally different approaches to portable gaming hardware. Their internal components reveal distinct design philosophies and target audiences, analysis suggests.

Processor Comparison: Custom Nvidia vs AMD Zen 2

A custom Nvidia processor sits at the heart of the Switch 2, most likely the Tegra T239 according to industry insiders [2]. This ARM-based chipset utilizes Cortex-A78C cores paired with a custom GPU [19]. Performance analysis indicates the Switch 2 will reach power levels comparable to PlayStation 4 and Xbox One, potentially making it slightly faster than the Steam Deck's processor [2].

The Steam Deck employs a semi-custom AMD APU featuring a Zen 2 CPU with four cores and eight threads [19]. This x86-based chip operates at 2.4-3.5GHz clock rates [19]. Despite the Steam Deck's higher CPU frequency compared to the Switch 2's docked mode [19], overall performance differences appear minimal when considering complete system architecture.

GPU Power: DLSS and Ray Tracing vs RDNA 2

Graphics capabilities represent perhaps the most significant hardware distinction between these devices. NVIDIA officially confirmed that the Switch 2's GPU contains "dedicated RT Cores and Tensor Cores for stunning visuals and AI-driven enhancements" [4]. This enables two critical features:

1. Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) - AI upscaling technology that improves resolution

2. Ray Tracing - Advanced lighting technology that enhances game details

Many analysts consider DLSS the Switch 2's "secret weapon," allowing it to deliver visuals and frame rates beyond what the hardware alone could achieve [19]. This approach contrasts sharply with the Steam Deck's strategy.

The Steam Deck features an RDNA 2 GPU integrated into its APU [19]. While less powerful than some other PC gaming handhelds like the ASUS ROG Ally [4], it delivers solid performance for its form factor. Unlike the Switch 2, the Steam Deck relies primarily on raw power and SteamOS optimizations rather than AI upscaling techniques.

RAM and Storage: 12GB vs 16GB, UFS vs NVMe SSD

Memory allocation marks another key difference between these systems. The Switch 2 features 12GB of RAM, while the Steam Deck includes 16GB of LPDDR5 RAM [2]. This gives the Steam Deck a notable advantage for multitasking and memory-intensive applications.

For storage, the Switch 2 comes with 256GB of UFS (Universal Flash Storage) built-in [2]. This capacity sits between the Steam Deck LCD's 256GB and the Steam Deck OLED's 512GB and 1TB options [4]. Despite having less internal storage, the Switch 2 offers an interesting expansion advantage:

• Switch 2: Supports microSD Express cards (PCIe 3.0 NVMe) up to 2TB [1]

• Steam Deck: Supports standard microSDXC and microSDHC cards [2]

The microSD Express standard delivers significantly faster transfer speeds than traditional microSD cards, giving Nintendo an edge in expanded storage performance. The Steam Deck provides user-upgradable internal storage, as all models come with M.2 2230-sized SSDs that can be replaced by opening the system [1].

These handhelds take distinctly different approaches to hardware architecture. The Switch 2 emphasizes AI-enhanced visuals and efficient design, focusing primarily on Nintendo's signature games with specific art styles. The Steam Deck offers raw computing power and greater flexibility for PC gaming. First-time handheld console buyers should consider not just technical specifications, but also which games they ultimately want to play on their device.

Display Technology: Visual comparison reveals key differences

Image Source: Polygon

Screen specifications play a crucial role in portable gaming experiences, with the Nintendo Switch 2 and Steam Deck adopting fundamentally different approaches to display technology. These differences significantly impact visual quality and battery consumption during gameplay.

The Nintendo Switch 2 features a larger 7.9-inch LCD touchscreen display with full HD resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. This represents a substantial upgrade from the original Switch's 6.2-inch screen and even surpasses the Switch OLED's 7-inch display.

The Steam Deck OLED, by comparison, incorporates a slightly smaller 7.4-inch touchscreen running at a lower resolution of 1280 x 800 pixels. The LCD variant offers an even smaller 7-inch display. This resolution difference creates noticeably sharper visuals on the Switch 2, with approximately 280 pixels per inch compared to the Steam Deck's 215 pixels per inch.

Panel technology introduces additional complexity to the comparison. While the Switch 2 employs LCD technology with traditional backlighting, the Steam Deck OLED boasts superior contrast, 110% coverage of the P3 color space, and impressive brightness capabilities. The OLED model reaches 600 nits in standard mode and approximately 1,000 nits when displaying HDR content.

The Switch 2's 120Hz refresh rate enables exceptionally smooth gameplay, doubling the original Steam Deck LCD's 60Hz and surpassing even the Steam Deck OLED's 90Hz capability. Both the Switch 2 and Steam Deck OLED support Variable Refresh Rate technology, allowing the display to synchronize with the game's frame rate to eliminate screen tearing and provide smoother visuals during performance fluctuations.

For HDR support, the Switch 2 includes HDR10 in both handheld and docked modes, enhancing visual quality through better definition between light and dark areas while improving color reproduction and contrast. Nintendo confirms this feature will "serve up more realistic lighting effects and illumination, which will ultimately help add depth and make your favorite Nintendo worlds pop."

The Steam Deck's HDR implementation varies by model—standard LCD versions lack HDR support entirely, while OLED variants include HDR capabilities. Industry observers note the Steam Deck OLED's implementation is particularly impressive due to its panel characteristics: "It's a gorgeous screen, with stellar viewing angles and brilliant color reproduction, making 800p games somehow look higher resolution."

Nintendo has clarified that HDR will be "only available in supported games," with titles like Mario Kart World and enhanced editions of Zelda: Breath of the Wild and Tears of the Kingdom confirmed to utilize this feature.

Gaming Performance: How the handhelds compare in real-world use

Real-world gaming performance, rather than technical specifications alone, determines which handheld delivers the superior gaming experience. The Nintendo Switch 2 and Steam Deck employ fundamentally different approaches to portable gaming, with each system's strengths becoming apparent during actual gameplay.

DLSS vs Native Rendering: Frame rates and visual quality

Nintendo's reliance on NVIDIA's DLSS technology allows the Switch 2 to achieve impressive visual output despite modest hardware. The upcoming Metroid Prime 4: Beyond targets 1080p at 120fps in handheld mode and 4K at 60fps when docked [8]. This represents a 5.76x boost in pixel throughput compared to the original Switch [8].

The DLSS implementation demonstrates remarkable efficiency across various titles:

• Street Fighter 6 upscales from 540p to a clean 1080p image so convincingly that many assumed it was native resolution [9]

• Cyberpunk 2077 runs between 720p and 1080p with dynamic resolution scaling, targeting 30fps [8]

• Final Fantasy 7 Intergrade appears to maintain a native 1080p resolution at 30fps [8]

The Steam Deck primarily relies on native rendering with assistance from AMD's FSR technology. Games typically run at lower resolutions, often below native 800p, to maintain acceptable frame rates [1]. While the Steam Deck can theoretically output at 4K to external displays, it lacks the specialized AI upscaling hardware found in the Switch 2 [2].

System Software: Customization vs Consistency

SteamOS 3 provides extensive customization options that enhance the gaming experience. Users can create per-game performance profiles that adjust TDP limits and GPU clock speeds, extending battery life for less demanding titles or maximizing performance for graphically intensive games [10].

The system includes several optimization features:

• Vulkan Shader Precompilation eliminates shader compilation stutter [10]

• Integer scaling ensures crisp pixel art representation [10]

• Frame rate limiting maintains consistency and preserves battery [10]

• Plugin support through Decky Loader enables additional customization [10]

Nintendo's system software takes a distinctly different approach, focusing on simplicity and consistency. While the Switch 2 supports graphics/performance modes in some titles like Metroid Prime 4, "the complexity is unlikely to ever surpass a simple this-or-that affair" [3]. This philosophy ensures games work optimally without requiring technical knowledge [3].

The Switch 2's closed ecosystem allows developers to create tightly optimized experiences tailored to its specific hardware [3]. Digital Foundry notes that "the efficiency of the silicon itself combined with bespoke game integrations from developers are going to be key in getting decent mobile experiences" [8].

Game Libraries: Exclusives vs Variety

The Nintendo Switch 2's gaming library stands as its most compelling advantage. First-party Nintendo titles like Mario Kart World and Donkey Kong Bananza remain exclusively available on the platform [11]. FromSoftware's new vampire game DuskBloods will also launch exclusively on the hybrid handheld [4].

The Switch 2 offers backward compatibility, with most original Switch games playable on the new system [1]. Select titles receive "Switch 2 Edition" upgrades that enhance visuals and performance, such as The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild and Tears of the Kingdom [1].

For cross-platform titles, the Steam Deck generally delivers superior performance. One analysis found games like Hogwarts Legacy running at higher frame rates on Steam Deck versus Switch [12]. Nevertheless, both devices target different audiences—the Steam Deck appeals to PC gaming enthusiasts seeking portability, while the Switch 2 focuses on Nintendo's exclusive experiences [13].

As one industry observer noted: "People who are repeatedly saying there is no reason to pick up a Nintendo Switch 2 instead of a Steam Deck are missing the point that they cater to entirely different audiences" [13].

Battery life and portability

Battery endurance and physical dimensions represent crucial factors for handheld gaming devices. The Nintendo Switch 2 and Steam Deck offer markedly different approaches to portability, with trade-offs that directly impact the gaming experience.

Battery capacity differences

The Switch 2 contains a 5,220mAh lithium-ion battery, marking a 21% increase from the original Switch's 4,310mAh capacity. This translates to approximately 19.3Wh of power.

Steam Deck models feature substantially larger power reserves. The OLED version houses a 50Wh battery, while the LCD model contains a 40Wh battery. This means the Steam Deck OLED packs roughly 2.5 times more battery capacity than Nintendo's offering. The significant difference stems primarily from the Steam Deck's larger footprint, which accommodates additional battery cells.

Gaming duration on a single charge

These capacity differences translate to substantially different usage times. Nintendo officially states the Switch 2 will last between 2 to 6.5 hours depending on game intensity. Demanding titles like Metroid Prime 4 will likely drain the battery faster than indie games or 2D platformers.

The Steam Deck OLED boasts significantly longer battery estimates ranging from 3 to 12 hours. These estimates assume 30fps gameplay at 50% brightness and 50% volume, with actual duration varying based on specific games and settings.

Even at minimum battery estimates, the Steam Deck outperforms the Switch 2, offering at least 3 hours compared to the Switch 2's 2-hour minimum. For travelers or commuters, this difference could prove substantial during long journeys.

Weight considerations

The Switch 2 weighs approximately 535g with Joy-Con 2 controllers attached, making it about 27% heavier than the original Switch OLED (420g).

The Steam Deck tips the scales at 669g, making it roughly 25% heavier than the Switch 2. This weight differential makes the Switch 2 potentially more comfortable for extended gaming sessions, particularly for players with smaller hands or those who prioritize portability.

These portability specifications highlight an essential trade-off: the Steam Deck offers substantially longer battery life at the cost of added weight, whereas the Switch 2 provides a more balanced portable experience with moderate battery performance.

Controls and Ergonomics: Key differences in design approach

Image Source: PC Gamer

The Nintendo Switch 2 and Steam Deck employ fundamentally different approaches to controller design, affecting comfort during extended gaming sessions and offering distinct advantages to different types of players.

The most notable innovation in the Switch 2 controller lineup is the new mouse mode functionality built into each Joy-Con 2. When placed on a flat surface, the controller transforms into a mouse with the joystick functioning as a scrolling mechanism and the shoulder button serving as a left-click [20]. This proves particularly valuable in strategy games like Civilization VII, where precise cursor control is essential.

"The mouse mode allows one joystick to control zoom while the other manages camera movement, creating a more intuitive interface for strategy titles," said a Nintendo representative at the preview event [20].

Steam Deck, conversely, features dual capacitive trackpads with haptic feedback that simulate mouse control [19]. While these offer precision, their positioning has created problems for some users, with accidental touches disrupting gameplay. Valve has addressed this by allowing users to disable the trackpads entirely if preferred [19].

For customization options, the differences are stark. The Steam Deck provides four programmable back buttons activated with ring or pinky fingers [19] and extensive control remapping through SteamOS. By comparison, the Switch 2 emphasizes simplicity with fewer customization options, though it includes accessibility features like text-to-speech support [21].

The Steam Deck's fixed controller design incorporates ergonomic grips that enhance comfort during lengthy gaming sessions [22]. However, at 669g, users report its weight becomes noticeable during extended play.

The Switch 2 takes a different approach with magnetically detachable Joy-Con 2 controllers [19] that attach when a button is pressed and snap back when held near the console [4]. This modular design creates unique advantages:

• Each controller half functions independently for multiplayer gaming [4]

• Detached controllers allow various playing positions, potentially reducing hand fatigue

• When connected to the included accessory, Joy-Cons form a traditional controller with improved grip [4]

The basic Joy-Con 2 design lacks rear grips, leading many players to purchase ergonomic accessories like the Satisfye ZenGrip [4]. This highlights the fundamental difference in approach—the Steam Deck prioritizes integrated comfort while the Switch 2 focuses on versatility and adaptability.

Industry experts suggest these design choices reflect each company's broader philosophy. Nintendo continues its tradition of innovative, flexible control schemes that adapt to different play styles and social situations, while Valve has created a more PC-like experience optimized for solo gaming comfort.

Future-proofing: Which handheld offers longer-term value?

Long-term support and upgrade potential ultimately determine a handheld's value beyond initial purchase. The Nintendo Switch 2 and Steam Deck present contrasting approaches to future-proofing their respective ecosystems.

Nintendo has confirmed ongoing Switch 2 support through at least March 2025, while industry analysts from Ampere predict significant support extending through 2027 [23]. This extended support strategy mirrors Nintendo's historical patterns, as demonstrated when the 3DS received games like Metroid: Samus Returns years after the Switch launched [23].

Backward compatibility with most original Switch games provides a smooth transition between generations [24]. Nintendo is also introducing "Switch 2 Edition" versions of existing games featuring enhanced graphics and performance, available through paid upgrade packs [25]. This dual-platform approach benefits Nintendo financially while giving consumers flexibility in upgrading timeframes [23].

Valve takes a markedly different approach to future-proofing. Currently, no firm timeline exists for a Steam Deck 2 release, with Valve designer Lawrence Yang stating a "next-generation power upgrade won't be available for at least two or three years" [6].

More significantly, Valve is expanding SteamOS beyond its own hardware. The upcoming Legion Go S will become the first third-party device running SteamOS [7], with Valve promising "every feature comes over, if it runs Steam OS you have that full desktop mode, and you have that streamlined gaming experience" [26].

For physical upgrades, the platforms diverge substantially:

• Nintendo Switch 2: Limited to microSD Express cards (up to 2TB) for storage expansion [25], with no user-upgradeable internal components

• Steam Deck: Specifically designed for upgradeability—users can easily replace the SSD and make other hardware modifications [4]

The Steam Deck offers superior physical upgradeability, while the Nintendo Switch 2 promises longer first-party software support. For consumers, the priority—hardware flexibility or exclusive game access—should guide purchasing decisions.

Nintendo Switch 2 vs Steam Deck: Specifications compared

Comparing these two handheld gaming devices reveals significant differences in hardware capabilities and design philosophy, analysis suggests. The specifications table below highlights the key technical differences between Nintendo's upcoming console and Valve's established handheld PC.

Transport analytics company Inrix said the Switch 2's higher resolution display offers approximately 280 pixels per inch compared to the Steam Deck's 215 pixels per inch, though the OLED model's superior contrast may provide better visual perception despite lower resolution.

The most substantial difference appears in the battery capacity, with the Steam Deck OLED containing a 50Wh battery compared to the Switch 2's 19.3Wh unit - a factor contributing to the nearly 25% weight difference between the devices.

Storage options reveal another key distinction. While the Switch 2 comes with fixed 256GB internal storage, the Steam Deck offers user-replaceable SSDs ranging from 64GB to 512GB, according to manufacturer specifications.

Nintendo Switch 2 vs Steam Deck: Which handheld offers better specs?

Core Hardware: Fundamentally Different Approaches

Nintendo's Switch 2 employs a custom Nvidia processor, most likely the Tegra T239 according to industry analysts. This ARM-based chipset utilizes Cortex-A78C cores paired with a custom GPU that potentially matches PlayStation 4 and Xbox One performance levels.

The Steam Deck takes a different direction with a semi-custom AMD APU featuring a Zen 2 CPU with four cores and eight threads running at 2.4-3.5GHz. Despite the Steam Deck's higher CPU frequency, the overall performance difference appears minimal when considering complete system architecture.

Graphics capabilities represent the most significant hardware distinction. Nintendo has confirmed the Switch 2's GPU contains "dedicated RT Cores and Tensor Cores for stunning visuals and AI-driven enhancements." This enables two critical features absent in the Steam Deck: Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) and ray tracing support.

Memory configurations differ substantially as well. The Switch 2 features 12GB of RAM compared to the Steam Deck's 16GB of LPDDR5. For storage, Nintendo provides 256GB of built-in UFS storage with microSD Express expansion support, while Valve offers user-upgradable SSDs ranging from 64GB to 512GB.

Display Quality: Resolution vs Panel Technology

The Switch 2 features a larger 7.9-inch LCD touchscreen delivering 1920 x 1080 resolution—a substantial upgrade from the original Switch's 6.2-inch display. In contrast, the Steam Deck OLED comes with a 7.4-inch touchscreen running at a lower 1280 x 800 resolution, while the LCD variant offers an even smaller 7-inch display.

This resolution difference creates noticeably sharper visuals on the Switch 2 at approximately 280 pixels per inch compared to the Steam Deck's 215 pixels per inch. However, panel technology creates an interesting dynamic. The Steam Deck OLED boasts superior contrast, 110% coverage of the P3 color space, and impressive peak brightness capabilities reaching 600 nits in standard mode and approximately 1,000 nits for HDR content.

Refresh rate further differentiates these devices. The Switch 2 supports 120Hz, doubling the original Steam Deck LCD's 60Hz and surpassing even the Steam Deck OLED's 90Hz capability. Both the Switch 2 and Steam Deck OLED support Variable Refresh Rate technology, effectively eliminating screen tearing when performance fluctuates.

Battery Life and Portability: Capacity vs Weight

The Switch 2 contains a 5,220mAh lithium-ion battery, representing a 21% increase from the original Switch. By comparison, the Steam Deck OLED houses a substantially larger 50Wh battery, while the LCD model contains a 40Wh power cell.

These specifications translate to different real-world usage patterns. Nintendo states the Switch 2 will last between 2 to 6.5 hours depending on game intensity. The Steam Deck OLED claims significantly longer battery life ranging from 3 to 12 hours—a substantial advantage for travelers or commuters during extended journeys.

Physical dimensions further differentiate these handhelds. The Switch 2 weighs approximately 535g with Joy-Con controllers attached, making it about 27% heavier than the original Switch OLED. The Steam Deck tips the scales at 669g—roughly 25% heavier than Nintendo's offering. This weight differential makes the Switch 2 potentially more comfortable for extended gaming sessions, particularly for players with smaller hands or those prioritizing portability.

Controls: Fixed Design vs Modular Flexibility

The Switch 2 introduces mouse mode functionality built into each Joy-Con 2 controller. When placed on a flat surface, each controller can function as a mouse with the joystick acting as a scrolling mechanism. This proves particularly useful in strategy games like Civilization VII, where precise cursor control enhances gameplay.

The Steam Deck employs dual capacitive trackpads with haptic feedback that emulate mouse control. These provide precision but their positioning sometimes leads to accidental touches during gameplay, though users can disable them entirely if needed.

For customization, the Steam Deck offers four programmable back buttons activated with ring or pinky fingers, along with extensive control remapping through SteamOS. The Switch 2 emphasizes simplicity with fewer customization options but includes accessibility features like text-to-speech support.

Ergonomically, the Steam Deck features integrated grips for lengthy gaming sessions, though its 669g weight becomes noticeable during extended play. The Switch 2's modular design with detachable controllers allows various playing positions, potentially reducing hand fatigue for some users.

Comparison Table

Conclusion

After examining both systems, the choice between these handhelds depends on specific gaming priorities rather than raw specifications. The Switch 2 excels with its innovative DLSS technology, 120Hz display, and exclusive Nintendo titles. The Steam Deck offers superior battery life, greater hardware flexibility, and access to thousands of PC games through its open ecosystem.

Weight and portability favor the Switch 2, though battery life clearly goes to the Steam Deck OLED with its impressive 3-12 hour range. Performance comparisons reveal Nintendo's focus on optimized experiences through AI upscaling rather than raw power.

Controller design represents another fundamental difference between these systems. The Switch 2's detachable Joy-Con controllers provide versatility for different play styles, whereas the Steam Deck's fixed design offers ergonomic benefits during extended sessions.

Future-proofing considerations position these devices for different audiences. The Steam Deck thrives on hardware upgradeability and an expanding SteamOS ecosystem, while the Nintendo Switch 2 promises long-term first-party support and enhanced versions of beloved Switch titles.

Transport analytics firm GfK expects both devices to maintain strong sales through 2025, with the Steam Deck likely capturing the hardcore gaming market while the Switch 2 appeals to Nintendo's traditional family audience and portable gaming enthusiasts.

FAQs

Q1. How does the Nintendo Switch 2 compare to the Steam Deck in terms of size and portability? The Nintendo Switch 2 is noticeably thinner and lighter than the Steam Deck, making it more portable. It weighs 535g compared to the Steam Deck's 669g, allowing for easier transportation and potentially more comfortable extended play sessions.

Q2. What are the key differences in display technology between the two devices? The Nintendo Switch 2 features a 7.9-inch 1080p LCD screen with a 120Hz refresh rate and HDR10 support. The Steam Deck has a 7-inch 800p LCD screen (or 7.4-inch OLED in some models) with a 60Hz refresh rate (90Hz for OLED). The Switch 2's higher resolution and refresh rate may provide a smoother visual experience.

Q3. How do the control layouts differ between the Nintendo Switch 2 and Steam Deck? The Nintendo Switch 2 maintains detachable Joy-Con controllers with a new magnetic attachment system, offering versatility for different play styles. The Steam Deck has a fixed controller layout with additional features like back buttons and touchpads, which some users find more ergonomic for longer gaming sessions.

Q4. What are the main differences in game libraries and pricing between the two systems? The Nintendo Switch 2 will primarily feature Nintendo's exclusive titles and third-party games optimized for the platform, with games typically priced at $60-$70. The Steam Deck has access to a vast PC game library through Steam, often with more frequent sales and lower prices. The choice largely depends on which games and ecosystems you prefer.

Q5. How do the two devices compare in terms of performance and graphics capabilities? The Nintendo Switch 2 utilizes NVIDIA's DLSS technology and dedicated ray-tracing hardware to enhance graphics performance. While exact comparisons are difficult, the Switch 2 is expected to target 1080p/60fps for many games, with some reaching 120fps. The Steam Deck's performance varies widely depending on the game, but it generally targets 800p resolution with frame rates varying based on the title and settings.

References

[1] - https://www.polygon.com/analysis/510197/switch-2-vs-steam-deck-comparison-specs-hardware
[2] - https://www.phonearena.com/reviews/nintendo-switch-2-vs-steam-deck-oled_id7193
[3] - https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/switch-2-vs-steam-deck
[4] - https://screenrant.com/switch-2-steam-deck-hardware-compared/
[5] - https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/switch-2-vs-pc-gaming-handhelds/
[6] - https://www.theverge.com/tech/642866/nintendo-switch-2-steam-deck-lcd-oled-comparison-specs-price
[7] - https://www.eurogamer.net/digitalfoundry-2025-switch-2s-full-reveal-analyzed-how-powerful-is-nintendos-new-hardware
[8] - https://n4g.com/news/2664206/nintendo-switch-2-nvidia-dlss-delivers-impressive-upscaling-from-540p-to-1080p-in-street-fighter-6
[9] - https://www.xda-developers.com/steamos-3-features-changed-game-steam-deck/
[10] - https://www.nintendolife.com/features/opinion-steam-deck-fans-are-seriously-underestimating-the-switch-2
[11] - https://www.ign.com/articles/nintendo-switch-2-tech-analysis-is-4k-actually-realistic
[12] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbmSwgFZM7k
[13] - https://www.thegamer.com/steam-deck-vs-nintendo-switch-2-games-specs-comparison/
[14] - https://gizmodo.com/the-nintendo-switch-2-is-nice-and-its-mouse-gaming-mode-is-even-nicer-2000583719
[15] - https://www.laptopmag.com/gaming/nintendo-switch-2-vs-steam-deck
[16] - https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/189706-nintendo-switch/80287831?page=2
[17] - https://9meters.com/technology/consoles/nintendo-plans-long-term-support-for-original-switch-even-as-successor-looms
[18] - https://thinglabs.io/nintendo-switch-lifespan-how-much-longer-will-your-console-last
[19] - https://www.tomshardware.com/video-games/nintendo-switch-2-price-specs-release-date
[20] - https://www.pcgamesn.com/steam-deck/2-guide
[21] - https://www.tomsguide.com/gaming/handheld-gaming/steam-deck-2
[22] - https://www.resetera.com/threads/pcworld-valve-talks-steamos-ces-2025.1078710/